Do quakes follow the Moon?
A second dataset, joined to the first. The Moon’s phase and position are computed for every hour, filed in the lake, and matched to each earthquake by the hour it happened. Is there any pattern?
Read the ten-year investigation: do these patterns survive proper testing? →
Waiting for the first Moon file…
| Moon position | Time there | Quakes | Per day | Against average | Avg mag | Biggest | M3+ |
|---|
| Phase | Time there | Quakes | Per day | Against average | Avg mag | Biggest | M3+ |
|---|
How the Moon joins the lake
- Each hour the Worker computes the Moon’s phase, distance and position from a published low-precision lunar series (accurate to about half a degree). No outside service is called.
- The numbers are saved to the lake as a CSV file, then parsed into a
moontable with one row per hour. - “Position” is the Moon’s angle across the sky from the middle of New Zealand: overhead, setting, underfoot on the far side of the Earth, then rising again.
- Because the Moon spends the same time in each position, the table compares quakes per day spent there, not raw counts.
Read with care
Thirty days is about one lunar cycle, and earthquakes cluster: one large quake brings hundreds of aftershocks in the same few days. A swarm landing in one phase can make that phase look busy without the Moon having anything to do with it.
Any real tidal link is expected to be weak. Treat this as a worked example of joining two datasets, not as evidence. The longer the lake runs, the more meaningful the comparison becomes.
More from the lake
Earthquakes & the Moon: testing the connection
Ten years of GeoNet data, declustering, null models and the five patterns tested out of sample.
Open ↗NZ earthquakes, live
The map, magnitudes and depths behind this page.
Open ↗Crime & the Moon
The same Moon, set against three years of NZ Police counts.
Open ↗